Download Ebook A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America
This is exactly what you can extract from this publication. By soft file kinds, you can be available to read it in the gadget when you are in your means home in automobile or bus or perhaps train. It is your time additionally to review it when you are remaining in a waiting listing. And just how you can read A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America in your residence could make use of the moment before sleeping as well as working.
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America
Download Ebook A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America
Having lots of spare times as well as have no ideas to do something when vacation is extremely dull. In such time, you will most likely really feel that you are bored of your tasks. Going outside or hanging out with your pals may need even more loan. So, this is right to try connecting to the internet and search for guide collection. If you want to be created also in your holidays, you can use the precious collections of publications to read.
Often, individuals may think that analysis will be so trendy and also outstanding. Furthermore, individuals who read are thought about as a really creative individuals. Is that right? Possibly! One that can be born in mind is that reviewing habit does not only do by the creative people. Most of smart people also really feel lazy to review, in addition to read A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America It's seemly that individuals that have analysis habit have different individuality.
Thus, this internet site offers for you to cover your trouble. We show you some referred publications A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America in all kinds and also motifs. From usual writer to the popular one, they are all covered to give in this website. This A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America is you're looked for publication; you merely have to visit the web link page to show in this web site and afterwards go for downloading. It will not take often times to obtain one publication A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America It will certainly depend upon your internet connection. Just acquisition and download and install the soft documents of this book A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America
So, when you get this publication, it appears that you have actually discovered the best option, not only for today life but also next future. When investing few time to read this book, it will certainly imply far better than investing more times for talking and also hanging out to throw away the time. This is way, we truly advise A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers And The Origins Of Gun Control In America an analysis publication. It can be your correct friend being in the complimentary or leisure wherever you are. Yeah, you can review it in soft data in your simple device.
Review
"Impressive and illuminating."--Cass R. Sunstein, The New Republic"This book can help provide much-needed context and background in light of the national debate over gun control, regardless of your personal views on the right to bear arms."--The Vermont Bar Journal "This intelligent, carefully rendered history of gun policy in the United States...is challenging but essential reading for scholars, specialized undergraduates, and readers interested in law, criminal justice, and public affairs."--Library Journal"If proof were still needed that the study of the Second Amendment remains a fruitful source of inquiry, Saul Cornell's new book provides it. Crisply written and vigorously argued, A Well-Regulated Militia advances an often hackneyed debate by looking beyond the original concerns of the Revolutionary era. Cornell concisely demonstrates why so many of the contemporary fictions swirling around the meaning of this vexed clause depart from its real history."--Jack Rakove, author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Original Meanings"Saul Cornell provides a wonderful, original treatment of a much discussed subject. Based on a meticulous review of American history, Cornell shows that both sides of the debate over the Second Amendment are mistaken. This is a must-read."--Erwin Chemerinsky, Duke University School of Law"Jettisoning the rancorous partisanship and historical distortions of both advocates and opponents of gun control, Cornell recovers the lost civic dimension of the constitutional right to bear arms. The point of departure for any future, historically-informed discussion of this most controversial amendment, A Well-Regulated Militia clears the way for fresh and constructive thinking about the rights and responsibilities of gun ownership in America today."--Peter S. Onuf, author of Jefferson's Empire: The Language of American Nationhood"With this book Saul Cornell establishes himself as a leading interpreter of the Second Amendment, and teaches us valuable lessons not only about gun control and the militia, but about the nature of American republican government itself."--Stephen Presser, Northwestern University School of Law"A provocative alternative in the debate over the historical meaning of the Second Amendment. Anyone interested in how the right to bear arms was thought about in the early republic will need to take this book into account."--Keith E. Whittington, author of Constitutional Interpretation"A Well-Regulated Militia offers a much-needed examination of the varied notions of the right to bear arms that have prevailed at different moments in the history of the United States. Perhaps even more important, Cornell's study challenges the static conception that often dominates public discussion of this particular constitutional provision. By tracing the competing influences of the civic, states'-rights, individual-rights, and collective-rights theories of the role of arms in American society, Cornell reveals the often overlooked republican pairing of rights and duties that defined late-eighteenth-century gun ownership."--H-Net
Read more
About the Author
Saul Cornell is Professor of History at Ohio State University and Director of the Second Amendment Research Center at the John Glenn Institute. An authority on constitutional history and especially on the Second Amendment, he is the author of The Other Founders: Anti-Federalism and the Dissenting Tradition in America and editor of Whose Right to Bear Arms Did the Second Amendment Protect?
Read more
Product details
Paperback: 270 pages
Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1st edition (August 4, 2008)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0195341031
ISBN-13: 978-0195341034
Product Dimensions:
9.2 x 0.7 x 6 inches
Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
3.6 out of 5 stars
40 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#366,944 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is quoted every day by people who both favor and oppose gun ownership and use. A Well-Regulated Militia is a fascinating study into the meaning of the words of the Second Amendment both in their original context and how they have been reinterpreted over the years. It also explains the concept of self-defense as understood by the colonists, and how militias differed from standing armies, and why those differences were so important. America in the 1700s was a completely different place and you can get a glimpse into that world, and the evolution of the American experience, through this book. I recommend it to anybody who has strong opinions about guns in America.
A book that every gun owner should read and have.
No matter your stance on gun control and gun rights in America, the bias present throughout this book leaves it an unreliable source for historical events relevant to the Second Amendment. It appears to have motivated the author to conveniently leave out the cultural motivations for various rulings by the Supreme Court, allowing it to appear as if there has historically been a left-leaning slant due to an unspoken desire for gun control. As a side note, the author is fond of disregarding the connotation of a particular word to avoid sounding repetitive, making this an awkward read.
A tremendously informative book which is very difficult read, but well worth it. In spite of the excellent writing, I literally had to read every paragraph 4 or 5 times to fully understand its content.
This book provides a history of the gun control debate, going back to before the ratification of the Constitution. There really is nothing new under the sun. The books value is providing the background on positions (essentially three perspectives) taken today on the subject. It has all been hashed out several times in the past two hundred years. Interestingly the argument of today's opponents of gun control that their sacred 2nd. Amendment rights granted by the founders are being violated is of the most recent origin and really wasn't anywhere near the center of the argument in the late 18th Century. All in all it provides a source of well thought through arguments that if referenced will raise the current debate to a more scholarly tone than the from the gut wrenching, emotional tirades of today. The author does not preach or present a biased partisan view.
The five stars are sincere. It was just what I was looking for: an objective, well-written history of the 2nd amendment in American history. The organization is superb. It reads easily, with just enough background. Really a fascinating history. I was surprised that it ended before DC v. Heller, but this does not detract from the book at all. I was glad that he didn't know what was just around the corner.The objection from negative reviewers that the author was a stooge for special interests is absurd by any fair reading. I congratulate him for taking the time to write it, and for doing such a good job.I found the book browsing on Amazon and read it on a kindle.
This is not some dull constitutional law text. I gained a new perspective on American history as well as the evolution of the law regarding guns. The author proposes at the end of the book a sensible solution based on the historical development of the Second Amendment for protecting guns rights as well as crafting reasonable regulation for gun safety. The book is very readable. I'm glad I bought it.
Whatever you happen to believe about the original meaning of the Second Amendment is probably, if not altogether wrong, at least not altogether right. This, at least, is Saul Cornell's main contention in A Well Regulated Militia This is not because it is so hard to find out what people thought about the Second Amendment in 1790. It's just that so many people thought so many things that it is not really possible to reconstruct a coherent original understanding of the text. And even if we could, such an understanding would be based on a historical context that simply does not apply to America in the 21st century.Let's begin with that context. In the 18th century, local militias were kind of a big deal. Not only did most states and communities have them; most adult white males belonged to them, and were required to belong to them, as a condition of exercising other rights of citizenship. At this time, there was no standing army and no real professional police force. If a community wanted protection--from Indians, Redcoats, bad guys or whatever--the local militia had to provide it.And that's the way we liked it back then. Most people saw standing armies as instruments of tyranny. In Massachusetts and Virginia, the British governors had tried to disband militias, seize people's arms, and bring in professional soldiers (quartered in the homes of citizens) to provide protection. The colonists were not amused.The Second Amendment grew out of the concern that this sort of thing could happen again (so, too, did the Third Amendment, which forbids the quartering of soldiers in peacetime). When state legislators were petitioning the First Congress about possible amendments for the Bill of Rights, nearly all of them submitted amendments that would guarantee the right to bear arms AND prohibit a standing army during peace time. Federalist, who were unimpressed with the performance of the state militias during the Revolution, managed to fight off the objections to a standing army. To do this, however, they had to guarantee the perpetuity of state militias (and assure that soldiers would not be quartered in homes).What all of this gives us is a preamble to the Second Amendment that (translated into modern English) reads something like this: "Because a well-trained and well-provisioned militia is the only kind of security force consistent with the principles of a free Republic, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The key here is that serving in a militia was both a civic right and a civic responsibility, like voting or serving on juries. The two clauses in the Second Amendment emphasize both the civic duty ("a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state") and the civil right ("the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.") The right and the duty are inseparable. To the eighteenth-century mind, they could not be otherwise.Most of the things that we now associate with the Second Amendment were not part of the original understanding but results of various battles and court cases in the nineteenth century. Among the most important of these are:The Individual Right to Self-Defense, which was recognized as a common-law right during the Founding era but not applied to the Second Amendment until the Jackson era. At that time, however, new State constitutions in Mississippi, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, and (a little bit later), Texas merged the Constitutional right to bear arms with the common-law right to self-defense in statements like: "the right to bear arms in defense of self and state." This gradually became the orthodox interpretation (and on many ways still is). However, during Reconstruction, many Southern States rejected the Individual Rights approach to the Second Amendment in favor of a Collective Rights approach that rejected any individual Constitutional right to bear arms. They did so primarily because freed slaves were demanding the right to exercise their right to bear arms. Nonetheless, the Reconstruction-Era Theory of Collective Rights became the dominate liberal approach to the Second Amendment in the 20th centuryThe Collective Right of Resistance, or the belief that the right to bear arms gave state or local militias the right to resist federal tyranny. Anti-federalists in the First Congress wanted something like this in the Bill of Rights, but Federalists did not go out of their way to give it to them. According to Cornell, this is first used as a legal argument in the aftermath of Dorr's Rebellion (against the State of Rhode Island) in 1842. The Court, under the direction of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story flatly rejected this argument that any part of the Constitution conveyed a right of rebellion.The Individual Right of Revolution: The view that the Second Amendment was designed to give individuals (as opposed to state or community militias) the right to resist the tyranny of the state--completely unheard of in the Founding Era--has become something of an article of faith among gun-rights advocates in the 20th century. Cornell does an excellent job tracing this conception back to the 1850s and the abolitionist movement. This view finds expression in the abolitionist writings of Henry Ward Beecher and its fulfillment in the raid of John Brown. It has never been upheld in any court, and most Constitutional scholars believe that it completely reverses the original understanding of the Second Amendment by transforming it from an encouragement of civic virtue to an implement of civic destruction. Nonetheless, according to a recent poll, 65% of Americans believe that this is the purpose of the Second Amendment.(IMPORTANT NOTE: The Founders clearly recognized the natural right of revolution, which they exercised themselves in the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War. But this emphatically is not the same thing as the Constitutional right to revolution, which many people see--with no support from the Founders--in the Second Amendment today).So, where do we go from here. A lot of people think that we should base our interpretation of the Second Amendment on the "original intent" of the Founding Fathers. Could we do it? Sure. Here's how:1. Dismantle all branches of the American military2. Eliminate police forces3. Require all male citizens to own military weapons (i.e. eliminate the right NOT to bear arms)4. Allow government agents to record all weapons owned by citizens, to enter homes to inspect the weapons, and punish people for handling guns incorrectly.5. Require people to give up their own time every month to engage in unpaid military exercises (this, really, is what "well regulated" means)6. Require all citizens to bear arms in the defense of the common good, at the discretion of the executive and regardless of their personal beliefs, or face military discipline for insubordination7. Require everybody to sign a loyalty oath or lose the rights of citizenship, including the right to bear armsNone of these things, of course, is likely to happen. No modern American--liberal or conservative--would tolerate them. What this means, then, is that we are going to have to do what people did throughout the 19th and 20th centuries and interpret the Second Amendment in a way that makes sense for the context that we happen to live in. In his very eloquent final chapter, Saul Cornell recommends that we think about somehow reconnecting the civil right to bear arms with the civic virtue that doing so once entailed. Such an approach would recognize that people have a right to own guns, but that they also have a responsibility to "bear arms" in a way that contributes to, or at least does not detract from, the public good.I say let's do it.Michael AustinAuthor of That's Not What They Meant!: Reclaiming the Founding Fathers from America's Right Wing
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America PDF
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America EPub
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America Doc
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America iBooks
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America rtf
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America Mobipocket
A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar